Contempt for Courage

President Obama is taking Congress(**B) and* Romney on head-on. 

Republicans are all about the politics of opposition.  Democrats are all about the politics of getting things done.(*B)  But there are limits, and they are in the constitution and the three branches of government.  Now that is not a very satisfying thing.  Congress makes the laws, and the president must follow them, and they will not change until they are broken.  Republicans will take the country down while the president has all the tools at his disposal to make sure they don't succeed.  Of course it is under the guise of a disagreement, but is a disguise that the people must see through. 

A look back** is called for because that is where not keeping the change will take us.  Has there not been enough change?  Well just asking the question reminds me of the last administrations Secretary of Defense and his questioning and answering*** himself.   I really don't want to go there.

But the recent Fed mention of the loss of wealth in the last 20 years, parallels the dine and dash that has been a Republican solution that has not been removed from the table.  Democrats have fought wars and built the middle-class, while Republicans have cut checks and unbalanced the nation.

Is the President doing as much as some would like?  As it becomes more clear that Republicans will not, now is the time that he must.

[Hardball "Two Americas" Walsh / Feerey - Romney is not on the ballot?  The Act Act.]

* 6-16-12  link moved back one word(bold added)(Also [Hardball] links)
("Romney" to "and")
** Ctrl F "bite"
*** Ctrl F "Rumsfeld"
(*B) Go jump in the Lakoff(i.e. Ctrl F Lakoff)(oops)
(**B) two links added @"taking Congress"& @Romney reinsert new link
(***B) NFRY & vice verse us (or chicken or egg*c)

[UP w/ Chris Hayes(***B) Stand Your Ground and De-Policing.]
Hint: v.c.(not very crispy)
*c literally

FOOTNOTES PAGE TWO NOVEMBER 2014

11-17-14  (b.s.)  Jump in the Lakoff  Contempt for Courage , B. Navigation 3.0 , Bermuda , The %th EleFont , Go Jump in the Lakoff[!] , F. Work in Progress , (G-fp)  Papa mmmm ow ow!


                                                                                                                                              11-14-14 Not Just ... (aip) (b.s.): An Inconvenient Platonics? but co-op(T)ed! (fn/fp)correction, but further(b.s.)platonics: Econ(explitive), Light Speed, Rat Races Van Mices? (fp3-erization),
Neo-Romulan or Anti-Uncle? , Plane Platonics , 9-18-13 FP$, Rock, Paper, Scissor? , 4A , (~) To all those who served..., (~) The best laid plans..., (~) Aye of Newt, (~) Chart , (~) Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications. , D&R Tan ya?

Navigation 3.0

Looking Back
and the path forward.

Yesterday was a rough day,[final straw?] sometimes you had to be there, other times things get in the way and I missed both and not in the normal way. Personally(really! however Really?) it was demand side* activities that ruled the day.

OBAMA 2012!

[Under Construction]TO BE EVOLVED:
Seattle AM 1090 (sidetrack)
NPR .org KUOW

Stephanie Miller
Thom Hartmann WOW => OpEd **
WeGotEd We Need Ed The Ed Show

Norman Goldman Plan
Randi Rhodes No Hair is Good Hair In con text?

Rachel Maddow [*] NOW
Center for American Progress
OurFuture.org
Just Foreign Policy
Progressive Policy Etc.
Steve Clemons
David Sirota[**]
Lawrence O'Donnell The Last Word***
FOKS News Bleeped and Frackin' and saved for later folks.
* no really, not Keynesian, but personally just real work, real demands

** two for one [Bernie Sanders and MoveOn]

*** yeah right moore left/

[Tom Yesterday? And Beyond. ]
[Note Labels(sic?), Lucky Three?]
[Go jump in the Lakoff, and this will be a the start of a project itself.
[*] BOLD ADDED 4-6-2011 and THE TEST.
[PopQuiz.]
[** bold added and update]

The %th EleFont

Not to jump in the Lakoff, but my original heading was The %th Element*.  Which was a type-oh or capital gain on taking the 5th. Well, not that far.(But maybe we will see.) The 5th Element was meant as reference to Roman numeral "v" for the sake of my table ofor con tents. But it is still to be determined what page this is. 

So with this lede or misspell, it may be prophetic GeOhMeTry. i.e. Seg  Way to my original intents.
(Speaking of See Sea D? An Ed segue Center on Communicable Downers re:caller who thought the court is a dictionary.)

Speaking of Attacks Dogs and hold-ups...or holders?
[This was a heckuva sojourn.]

The original trigger:
Stephanie Miller ;-) Referencing Sarah Palin on the need to decimate the filter.  How who "chose their one" and "ushered him" into office.  Palin loses the God Particle.

Translation from the wings:  Sarah Palin wants to kill the medium.   

pc? speaking of wave NOT! Zed?
[but who knows]

* All of the above was here** before I finished there.  And well B4 Martin Bashir similarly rants.  Speaking of house of cards or Dawn Key Lake Offs!  Not to mention Vast Wind Mills.
** except first three(4) links (re:there)

Go Jump in the Lakoff[!]

NLP ?


 
With all due respect to National Liberal Party*, it is Neuro Linguistic Programming[!]


* even better No Labels Party 




[Not to Ribble, D'ribble or G'ribble but government is the punchline!]
R,D,G= rib'n riddle (de-, grand-)






Normally I embed footnotes, or rather change is more dependable, pardon the tangent, but...
I believe the Lakoff/Rove connection is crescent/type oh**. (i.e.) prescient


If corporations are people, how do you execute the government?

*pun on wrench typo

Bermuda

Try Angle ? 

Before I tan gent:  It is a clear choice. 
It might B 2 late, butt...  'twain GWB and DC*, pre and post selection. 
Not to jump in the Lakoff, but it about Clause Wits** and spectral orders.

[Translation / D'Ribble?: 'tween Bush and world order, or between what Bush ran on(not being policeman to the world), and what America runs on(speaking of spectral orders), the three branches of government and who the heck they work for.  Do we want a second shot at getting democracy right or just war left?  OW!]

* (sc) later: Bush(43)/vP-resident Cheney
**to parse Clausewitz later(or higher archy)

FP(k)not: A. / B. c. D. E. F. trope? ***

*** not to Footnote but NFRY. (Not to bury Neo-Cons, but to place in the mix, nor Peter, Paul or Merry.

Work in Progress

Pardon my Polish, let alone French.


The Thomas Gil affair.(Winkowski/Kerlikowske)
Noam Comski
Prior two ski(e)s.


(7-14-14) Original Heading "Poll R Express"(7-14-95 m-bed)


7-25-14  Revamp Devenn?
Under the Table?, Re/venn, irony, Tetra Heed Ron , heed / run, USC, legend,
Egg/Road/Sky* , Fight On


loss confirmed The Cycle/NOW
Confidence[?][!]... Ctrl F "if"@Go Jump in the Lakoff[!]

FOOTNOTES PAGE ONE JULY 2014

7-9-14  Consolidated Legends Page


7-7-14 Go Jump in the Lakoff[!],   Moderate Progressive Triad


7-1-14 Not Newfangled, Stiglitz, Reich, (7-2)-14 Bernstein, O'Donnell



7-14-14 Ge-oh sarcasm aside there are 6. A. Hi Ate Us, B. A Penchant for Leaning, C. "just supposed to 'call balls and strikes'-"  (FP2)